possm finished reading Peau noire, masques blancs by Frantz Fanon
Peau noire, masques blancs by Frantz Fanon
La décolonisation faite, cet essai de compréhension du rapport Noir-Blanc a gardé toute sa valeur prophétique : car le racisme, …
silly little guy he/it
My languages in order of proficiency: German French English Chinese. The reason I read so much in English is only because most pirated epubs are in English. I have no consistent grading system, the stars are based on vibes, don't read into it. I am not a critic; my "reviews" simply document what it was like for me to read the book in question.
This link opens in a pop-up window
90% complete! possm has read 27 of 30 books.
La décolonisation faite, cet essai de compréhension du rapport Noir-Blanc a gardé toute sa valeur prophétique : car le racisme, …
This book is a collection of texts from and/or about the transformative justice movement. Some of the texts are recycled material from zines or guides. Some are very practical guides, some are theoretical reflections; some real-life testimonials, some interviews. Many of the texts are really excellent: special mention to "What to do when you've been abusive", "Facing shame" and "Pod-mapping", for especially moving and growing things in me. However, the book as a whole lacks a good throughline. There is some logic to the basic four-part structure that the texts were ordered in, but it still feels like an unsorted, random collection of material. The fact that the material itself contains some absolute diamonds doesn't completely redeem the lack of editorial effort.
On a personal level though, reading this was an enlightening and healing experience.
La décolonisation faite, cet essai de compréhension du rapport Noir-Blanc a gardé toute sa valeur prophétique : car le racisme, …
This book argues that there is a new, Sinological form of orientalism at work in the world. It has shifted …
These interviews span from 1989 to 2017, it's nice to see how different topics were preoccupying bell hooks over the years. This is a nice book to get closer to her ideas and life. I especially like the diversity of perspectives: one of the interviews is for a Buddhist paper, one for an anarchist one. It's nice to see bell hooks through these different lenses.
Im Spätwerk Lenins verdichten sich Dringlichkeit und revolutionäre Schlagkraft in besonderer Weise. Dennoch stehen meist seine frühen Schriften im Rampenlicht. …
A little Spartacus book from the 1970s, consisting of two texts: the first, a translation of a text by Otto Rühle from 1939, so a text that was already historical in the 1970s. The second, a reflection upon Rühle's life and works by Paul Mattick. Out of the two, the text by Rühle has the merit of being at least historically interesting. The text's main thesis is that Bolshevism, and Lenin in particular, has led to the rise of fascism in Germany. This text is interesting as a historic document in the wider context of "leftist explanations for the rise of fascism". Rühle's writing is pretty well-structured, too. The text by Mattick is totally uninteresting. In the style of many Spartacus texts, it offers boring black-and-white political judgment over actual information. Otto Rühle is at least an interesting figure. I might find something else of him to read sometime.
This is a book based on an article, or rather it is an article inflated to the size of a book. I was able to tell after 30 pages, and got confirmed afterwards. This seems like a common practice in the US publishing world: an article-sized essay gets inflated through the addition of an introduction where terms are defined, and the insertion of examples. The argumentative structure stays the same, only now instead of occasionally nodding towards an example to support an argument, every argument gets one to several examples that are stretched to wikipedia length. This practice isn't necessarily a bad thing. In the case of this book, some of the examples given are things I didn't know anything about (the decolonial struggles of Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde), so this is a nice opportunity to learn something new. But all in all, this practice makes good essays longer and …
This is a book based on an article, or rather it is an article inflated to the size of a book. I was able to tell after 30 pages, and got confirmed afterwards. This seems like a common practice in the US publishing world: an article-sized essay gets inflated through the addition of an introduction where terms are defined, and the insertion of examples. The argumentative structure stays the same, only now instead of occasionally nodding towards an example to support an argument, every argument gets one to several examples that are stretched to wikipedia length. This practice isn't necessarily a bad thing. In the case of this book, some of the examples given are things I didn't know anything about (the decolonial struggles of Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde), so this is a nice opportunity to learn something new. But all in all, this practice makes good essays longer and worse. If it is often hard to tell what point Táíwò is trying to make when he goes into biographical details of some historic figure, that might be because these details aren't conducive to the point at all - they are just upping the word count. After finishing the book just now, I read the article that originated it (in the Boston Review, no paywall). The article makes several points that confused me in the book way clearer. In particular, the article cites Frazier's "Black Bourgeoisie" to generalize the point it makes about, well, elite capture. The book, on the other hand, gives us Frazier's backstory, the story of his parents, his intellectual legacy, etc. All this achieves (besides being interesting in the way a wikipedia article is) is to obscure the argument that Táíwò actually wants to make. So this is my conclusion: read the article. The book contains the same points, made with more words and less clarity. The points themselves are very good! The concept of elite capture is useful for critiquing nonconstructive uses of identity politics. It's a shame that the publishing industry doesn't incentivize conciseness.
A powerful indictment of the ways elites have co-opted radical critiques of racial capitalism to serve their own ends.
“Identity …